Friday, January 27, 2012

Pilsner Urquell

First off, this is one of my favorite "everyday" kind of brews. I can hardly think of a thing to complain about when I have it on-tap, and love places that have it available in that form (Union Grill in downtown Washington, PA comes to mind). This happens to be out the bottle, poured into a Stella Artois chalice glass.

Pilsner Urquell has a tarnished gold look, tawny, with a fluffy white head that says bye after a few minutes, but maintains an appetizing rim. Mostly clear and moderately carbonated. Lacing sticks to the glass in a sporadic sort of way.

Bready-yeast in the nose. Floral. Mild sourness; soft sauerkraut notes.

Bready (again) in taste with a prickly dryness and a yeasty flavor. Washes away nicely with a thrash of hops bitterness to hold it together. Not a watery mouthfeel. Clean, yet satisfying and astringent enough to keep things interesting. At 4.4%, this is a widely available session brew for the Czech pilsner aficionado.

As always, out the bottle and in the glass is better than just simply out the bottle. Doesn't beer have an aroma worth experiencing, too?

Friday, January 13, 2012

Two Misconceptions & What to do About Them

Encountering folks of various levels of beer experience comes with the territory on weekends for me, where I spend my time working at a beer distributor with a solid selection of imports, macros, regionals and micros. I enjoy recommending good beer (I recently sold a friendly couple on a Stoudt's variety pack, which is excellent, and a case just so happens to be sitting in my own kitchen) and have no problem advising customers on small beer related dilemmas (the cheaper the beer, the more bottles matter and glasses are rendered unnecessary).

There are a few of our customers of micros and the like that, as to be expected, know what they're looking for and know what they're talking about. And there are many more, usually macro drinkers, who act as if. They tend to hint at branching out with a different beer, but more often than not settle for an ordinary "go-to." They buy the cheap stuff and, to the chagrin of all employees, bother asking on the way out, "How much for the Chimay?" Everyone present, including the customer, knows that that case of Chimay Red will never make it to his car.

And then there's the kind of guy who comes in and says he's looking for a "light ale." He likes "light ales." You know, like Yuengling's Lord Chesterfield Ale...He doesn't like "dark ales like pilsners." Which brings me to the two big misconceptions about beer in the American mainstream.

One, and I say this without snobbery: an ale is not synonymous with a lighter and lower alcohol beer, and a lager is not synonymous with a larger, robust beer. If one is really interested in beer, these are very basic facts, and among the most important to know.

The way I prefer to break it down is as follows: all beer is either an ale or lager (the type or class, though class may have a negative connotation), and from there are styles within the type (a stout is one style of ale, a pilsner is one style of lager). Why are there two types? Yeast strains and fermentation temperatures (ale yeasts go to work at room temperature and lager yeasts work in colder temperatures). Ales can be imbibed literally 3-4 weeks after they are brewed. The best lagers take about 2-3 months, though macros, in some cases, cut corners and push their lagers on the shelf in a shorter period.

The second misconception: some seem to mistake bitterness for darkness. This is simply a symptom of unestablished palates and/or drinking from the bottle or can. On more than one occasion I've had friends or family say they had found a beer I recommended to be too dark for their tastes, even though the beer I recommended was a golden colored pilsner, a style in which dark malts are traditionally absent. In actuality, they were talking about the hoppy character of the brew.

A little light reading of reputable beer literature with a good local beer in an appropriate glass by one's side will do the trick for folks who've begun to show interest in what I consider to be the greatest beverage on earth, but feel they've got a few questions yet to be answered. After all, it worked for me and continues to do so. Enjoy your beer.

Thursday, January 5, 2012

New Belgium Brewing Co's Snow Day Winter Ale

A gift from a friend, Snow Day pours a very dark brown and mahogany-shaded bottom. A glorious beige head up top; both fluffy and sticky.

The smell is lively, fruity and hoppy. Beautiful citrusy hops; sweeter than they are bitter. Caramel malts sit just below the hops, inviting me in.

There is a stout-like roastiness to the taste immediately up front. Hop bitterness in the middle. Clean on the back end, making the taste multidimensional and the beer altogether very approachable. Odd wet malts. This beer would seem watery if not for the roasted malts and unabashed bitterness and note: peppery hop flavor. Let it warm up a bit and the malt end breathes.

Glad I tried this. I'll gladly do so again.

Notes: While I enjoyed this beer, I'm a bit ambivalent about my overall impression. It's kind of watery, but I found myself quaffing this with continued interest. It's bitter, but malty flavors seem almost non-existent. It's certainly worth a try. Who knows? You might find yourself wondering, and drinking, and wondering some more...